On the Subject of ‘grade inflation’ . . .


                 It is not well known that in the Province of Ontario, the percentage of ‘Ontario Scholars’ (those attaining at least 80% in 6 best qualifying Grade 12 courses) that makes up part of the yearly secondary school graduating class has steadily increased since inception of the honour in the 1960’s.

                With province-wide, standard, compulsory final exams (then known as ‘departmentals’) in now extinct Grade 13, 5% of graduates achieved ‘Ontario Scholar’ status. With ‘finals’ having lost their pre-eminent role course averages in the 1980’s, 40% of Grade 12 graduates received certificates of recognition. Later still, it has been reported as recently as 2014, without contradiction, that around 60% of the graduating year is privileged to call themselves ‘Ontario Scholars’.

                 Even in the eyes of the general public, that is quite an increase ... that has no official explanation.

                  But, maybe there is an ‘explanation’, a reason that is whispered among school teachers and administrators, while shouted out by critics of current education: ‘grade inflation’.
The trend has been regarded by some as a creeping, insidious problem that has gradually compromised the means by which teachers (even in post-secondary settings *) assess a student’s performance relative to his or her classmates. Some go further and decry the seeming watershed of ‘A’s’ as recognition of superior achievement that, having regard to objective standards, is not merited. The controversy continues, yet the fact remains that ‘grade inflation’ is here to stay (what has been widely handed out is hard to retreat from).

                  The clustering of averages above 80% has impacted approaches by students as each progresses through the middle to upper grades, particularly when evidence of significant achievement is needed to matriculate to a better college, university, limited enrollment programs and professional courses. Some have appreciated that the need to be well beyond 80% has to be addressed, but not everyone is able to independently reach the required average (percentile).

                   Quality tutoring can and does significantly contribute to adding the all important additional percentage points, by means of individual attention, disciplined achievement in course assignments, plus proper, sophisticated study habits and preparation for final exams, and especially for required external (entrance/qualifying) exams (outside school boards) that institutions outside Ontario and other provinces may insist upon. There are next to no second chances to better an average and competition has never been keener in terms of number of applicants to post-secondary education and the prevalence of that ‘cluster’.

                    Quite frankly, whatever students and parents think about ‘grade inflation’ in school systems in Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, and Montreal, it remains that professional tutoring is very often needed to work beneficially and maximize results in order to account for and offset the negative aspects of a trend that simply isn’t going away. In that important regard, Book Smart Tutors is just a toll-free phone call or email away.

( * for example, in a controversial attempt to counteract ‘grade inflation’, Princeton University in 2004 introduced a requirement that only a maximum of 37% of those taking a course could receive ‘A’s’.)


(Robert MacFarlane is a graduate of Princeton University, and he has been associated with Book Smart Tutors
 for several years, tutoring in English and its use in other disciplines.)


Comments